22 Ariz. App. 83 - Woods v. Harker’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 1994
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 18 Ariz. App. 75 - Purcell v. Zimbelman · 8 Ariz. App. 351 - Ulan v. Richtars · 19 Ariz. App. 422 - Anderson Aviation Sales Company, Inc. v. Perez · 32 Wis. 2d 580 - Geis v. Hirth · Rodgers v. Carter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice, or when separate trials will be conducive to expedition and economy, may order a separate trial of any claim, cross-claim, counter-claim, or third-party claim, or of any separate issue or of any number of claims, cross-claims, counterclaims, third-party claims, or issues, always preserving inviolate the right of trial by jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Williams v. Thude““The court, in furtherance of convenience or to avoid prejudice * * * may order a separate trial of any claim * * * or of any separate issue or any number of claims * * * always preserving inviolate the right of trial by jury.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“what appears to him to be the best thing to do,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.