¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2The defendants in error recovered a judgment by default* in the Desha Circuit Court, against the plaintiffs in error, for $25000 debt, and $1500 damages.
¶3The counsel for the defendants admits that the recovery, upon the declaration, was excessive, offers to remit the excess, and asks an affirmance under the rule, &c.
¶4But two objections are taken to the writ, which are founded in fact, as it appears in the transcript before us : 1st. that it has no seal, and 2d. that it was directed to Henry Smith, the sheriff, and was served and returned, as appears from the return endorsed, by Thomas McKallister, the coroner of the county.
¶51. It has been the practice of this court to reverse judgments by default in cases where the summons was without the official seal of the clerk, and such writs were treated as void. But in Mitchell vs. Conley, 13 Ark. 418, the court, upon a review of its previous decisions, held that writs were not void for such defects, but voidable, and that the court below possessed the power to amend them on application.
¶6Here no application was made to amend, and the defect in the writ is cause of reversal.
¶72d. The writ being directed to the sheriff, the coroner had no authority to execute it. Hughes vs. Martin, 1 Ark. 386. If the sheriff was disqualified to serve the writ, there should have been an affidavit of the fact, and the writ directed to the coroner. Gould’s Dig., chap. 38, sec. 7, 8; 14 Ark. 59.
¶8The judgment must be reversed, the cause remanded, and the plaintiff in error must be regarded as in court under the rule, &c.