Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Ark. App. 144 - Banning v. State

22 Ark. App. 144 - Banning v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

63
cited by 63 later decisions
1
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

63 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 63 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably Young v. Smith (1998), Noble v. Norris (2006)

63 state decisions

20019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West Coast Exploration Co. v. McKay · Lane v. State · Hoffman v. State · City of Phoenix v. Rodgers · 11 Ark. App. 294 - Cavin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 63 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rule of almost universal application is that there is a distinction between want of jurisdiction to adjudicate a matter and a determination of whether the jurisdiction should be exercised. Jurisdiction of the subject matter is power lawfully conferred on a court to adjudge matters concerning the general question in controversy. It is power to act on the general cause of action alleged and to determine whether the particular facts call for the exercise of that power. Subject matter jurisdiction does not depend on a correct exercise of that power in any particular case. If the court errs in its decision or proceeds irregularly within its assigned jurisdiction, the remedy is by appeal or direct action in the erring court. If it was within the court’s jurisdiction to act upon the subject matter, that action is binding until reversed or set aside.”
    9 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.