Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 CAL2D 169 - People v. Kelley

People v. Kelley’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

62
cited by 62 later decisions
2
states following
May 2010
most recently cited

2 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 62 later decisions — most recently May 2010 · most notably 44 Cal. 2d 434 - People v. Cahan (1955), In Re Dixon (1953)

2 district · 58 state decisions

31019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 47 U.S.C. § 501 · 47 U.S.C. § 605

Relies on Boyd v. United States · Weeks v. United States · Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States · Nardone v. United States · Gouled v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 62 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It was concluded [in the Gonzales case] that the use of evidence obtained through an illegal search and seizure does not violate due process of law because it does not affect the fairness or impartiality of the trial. The fact that an officer acted improperly in securing evidence presented against a defendant does not prevent the court from rendering a fair and impartial judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “No person not being entitled thereto shall receive or assist in receiving any interstate or foreign communication by wire or radio and use the same or any information therein contained for his own benefit or for the benefit of another not entitled thereto.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.