Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 CAL2D 540 - Strong v. Strong

Strong v. Strong’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

50
cited by 50 later decisions
3
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 50 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably 54 Cal. 3d 26 - Droeger v. Friedman, Sloan & Ross (1991), 140 Cal. App. 2d 185 - Strangman v. Duke (1956)

48 state decisions

24019431950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 3 Cal. 2d 740 - Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co. · Taylor v. Taylor · Moore v. Copp · In re the Estate of Garcelon · Stewart v. Stewart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 50 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant contends that the judgment quieting title in her should be affirmed on the ground that she was induced by her husband’s false representations to sign the deed. Defendant did not plead fraud, however, although the general rule that fraud must be specifically pleaded [citation] applies particularly to quiet title actions. [Citations.] Defendant, moreover, is not the legal owner, for title passed on execution of the deed. [Citation.] Any rights that she might have to the cancellation of the deed or to the declaration of a constructive trust are entirely equitable [citations], and it is settled that such rights cannot be established in an action to quiet title when the pleadings contain merely general allegations asserting defendant’s ownership and denying that of the plaintiff. [Citations.]””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.