22 Cal. App. 519 - Blevins v. Mullally’s Empirical Analysis
1913
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently October 2005 · most notably Dickey v. Raisin Proration Zone No. 1 (1944), 21 Cal. 3d 527 - Estate of Banerjee (1978)
2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Danielson v. Sykes · Kellogg v. King · Mendelson v. McCabe · Triscony v. Brandenstein · Hahn v. Garratt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the trespass is continuous in its nature, if repeated acts of wrong are done or threatened, although each of these acts, taken by itself, may not be destructive, and the legal remedy may therefore be adequate for each single act if it stood alone, then also the entire wrong will be prevented or stopped by injunction, on the ground of avoiding a repetition of similar actions. In both cases the ultimate criterion is the inadequacy of the legal remedy. ’ ’ Citing a large number of cases.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Hayes v. Hayes“where appropriate and necessary to the just enforcement of the provisions of a statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.