Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 CALAPP3D 655 - Hoffman v. Rogers

Hoffman v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
6
states following
November 1991
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 1991

24 state decisions

140197219801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Duprey v. Shane · 188 Cal. App. 2d 535 - Deauville v. Hall · 220 Cal. App. 2d 128 - McIvor v. Savage · 8 Cal. App. 3d 467 - Wickham v. North American Rockwell Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`That independent professions by the fact of business contact with the employer should be absolved of responsibility for mistake, avoidable or unjustified neglect resulting in secondary affliction, seems obnoxious to the purpose and spirit of such a statute. To so hold might induce industry to encourage quackery, to place a premium upon negligence, inefficiency and wanton disregard of the professional obligations of medical departments of industry, toward the artisan.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) Where the conditions of compensation exist, the right to recover such compensation, pursuant to the provisions of this division is, except as provided in Section 3706, the exclusive remedy for injury or death of an employee against the employer or against any other employee of the employer acting within the scope of his employment, except that an employee, or his dependents in the event of his death, shall, in addition to the right to compensation against the employer, have a right to bring an action at law for damages against the other employee, as if this division did not apply, in the following cases: “(1) When the injury or death is proximately caused by the willful and unprovoked physical act of aggression of such other employee. “(2) When the injury or death is proximately caused by the intoxication of such other employee.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The Duprey case also involved the liability of Dr. Harrison, an employee of Dr. Shane, who aided in treating the plaintiff. Implicitly the court held that the principles which imposed liability on Dr. Shane were just as applicable to his employee, Dr. Harrison.... The principles expressed in the Duprey decision are controlling here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.