Willis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2019
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 22 Cal. 3d 388 - Hale v. Morgan · 263 Cal. App. 2d 41 - Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of Supervisors · 48 Cal. 3d 1 - Kizer v. Hanna · 5 Cal. App. 4th 155 - Department of Personnel Administration v. Superior Court · Chirmside v. Board of Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not to take judicial notice will be upheld on appeal unless the reviewing court determines that the party furnished information to the trial court that was so persuasive that no reasonable judge would have refused to take judicial notice of the matter. [Citation.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[S]tatutes operate prospectively, although postenactment circumstances and laws change. (2B Sutherland, Statutory Construction (5th ed.) § 49.02, pp. 2-3.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A disability retirement is not, by definition, permanent. ( Cal. Code Regs., tit. 2, § 446.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.