Holcombe v. Holcombe’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably Bower v. D'Onfro (1997), 73 Conn. App. 103 - Rome v. Album (2002)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Barnard v. Barnard · Blake v. Blake · 16 Conn. App. 412 - Miller v. Miller · Rostain v. Rostain · 19 Conn. App. 161 - Cattaneo v. Cattaneo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Motions for interpretation or clarification, although not specifically described in the rules of practice, are commonly considered by trial courts and are procedurally proper.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage“There is no time restriction imposed on the filing of a motion for clarification.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“under the common law, judgments may be "corrected”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.