Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 DEL 120 - State v. Wickenhoefer

State v. Wickenhoefer’s Empirical Analysis

1906

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
4
states following
August 1975
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently August 1975

5 state decisions

3019061910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Munn v. Illinois · United States v. Cruikshank · Barbier v. Connolly · Connolly v. Union Sewer Pipe Co. · Gulf Ry Co v. Ellis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is manifest that the Legislature believed that excessive and unlawful rates were exacted under the guise of ‘services rendered’ and ‘expenses incurred’.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.