Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.1d 217 - Brewer v. Jacobs

Brewer v. Jacobs’s Empirical Analysis

22 F. 217 · 1884

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
August 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2012

4 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

2018841890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stewart v. Sonneborn · White v. Nicholls · Wheeler v. Nesbitt · State v. Potter · James v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is in no sens© whatever an examination of the juror on his voir dire. It is, in law, no trial of a juror for the purposes for which originally triers were appointed, nor would the circumstances give the party in court the right to challenge a juror at that time, nor has a challenge ever, in this court, been made on such a call.” Id. 243 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.