¶1Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; Wm. N. Runyon, Judge.
¶2Irving Siegler, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.
¶3Walter G. Winne, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Hackensack, N. J., and Harlan Besson, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Hoboken, N. J.,
¶4Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
¶6This is an. appeal from a decree that certain premises were a nuisance, as defined by section 21, title 2, of the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA § 33), and ordering their closure. No principle of law is involved, and the only question is one of fact. As we feel, after á study of the proofs, that the findings by the judge, who had the witnesses before him, were correct, we limit, ourselves to so stating, and affirm the decree.