Simson Bros. v. Blancard & Co.’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.2d 498 · 1927
Citation profile
19 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1981 · most notably Carter-Wallace, Inc. v. Davis-Edwards Pharmacal Corp. (1971), Bose Corp. v. Linear Design Labs, Inc. (1972)
19 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on George Cutter Co. v. Metropolitan Electric Mfg. Co. · A. B. Dick Co. v. Barnett · Newhall v. McCabe Hanger Mfg. Co. · Hildreth v. Norton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an injunction pendente lite in a patent suit should not go except when the patent is beyond question valid and infringed.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“All questions of the adequacy of . . . proof . . . must await trial. It is enough now that the outcome is patently doubtful.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.