United States v. Malave’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 145 · 1994
Citation profile
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Messino (1995), United States v. Standiford (1998)
22 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 111 (Federal Judiciary Protection Act of 2002) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Tollett v. Henderson · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Mayers v. United States · Komen v. Robbins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In order to succeed on [an ineffective assistance of counsel] claim, a defendant must show that advice on which his plea was predicated not only 'was not within the range of competence demanded of attorneys in criminal cases,' but also that there is a 'reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional error, the result ... would have been different.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a court need not determine whether counsel's performance was deficient before examining the prejudice suffered by the defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result ... would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.