United States v. Reddeck’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 1504 · 1994
Citation profile
69 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 113 later decisions — most recently June 2025 · most notably United States v. Deninno (1994), United States v. Hardwell (1996)
69 federal appellate · 8 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1341 (White-Collar Crime Penalty Enhancement Act of 2002) · 18 U.S.C. § 1342 · 28 U.S.C. § 1654
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Faretta v. California · Ohio v. Roberts · Cupp v. Naughten · Pereira v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 113 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the guidelines do not provide for an abstract factoring of a victim's residual and subjective 'satisfaction.' Calculation of lost value requires an objective standard, usually measured by 'fair market value.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“the trial judge should conduct a thorough and comprehensive formal inquiry ... on the record to demonstrate that the defendant is aware of the nature of the charges, the range of allowable punishments and possible defenses, and is fully informed of the risks of proceeding pro se.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A district court's factual determination of loss under § 2F1.1 is reviewed under a clearly erroneous standard, but the factors the court may consider are reviewed de novo.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.