Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.3d 190 - Rowley v. Yarnall

Rowley v. Yarnall’s Empirical Analysis

22 F.3d 190 · 1994

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
August 2016
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently August 2016 · most notably In Re Alexander (2006), In Re Slusher (2007)

12 federal appellate · 2 district ·

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1129 · 11 U.S.C. § 1225 · 11 U.S.C. § 1227 · 11 U.S.C. § 1228

Relies on Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc. · D. Ginsberg & Sons, Inc. v. Popkin · Kham & Nate's Shoes No. 2, Inc. v. First Bank of Whiting · Windsor on the River Associates, Ltd. v. Balcor Real Estate Finance, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “was designed to 'give family farmers facing bankruptcy a fighting chance to reorganize their debts and keep their land ... while at the same time, preventing abuse of the system and ensuring that farm lenders receive a fair repayment.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “an assurance that what can be done to protect their interests will be done. Disposable income is simply a measure of what can be done to promote fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Chapter 11 needlessly complicated, unduly time consuming, inordinately expensive, and, in too many cases unworkable,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.