Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.3d 222 - United States v. Hoff

United States v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis

22 F.3d 222 · 1994

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
September 2017
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently September 2017

14 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

140199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · Brandenburg v. Ohio · Aetna Life Insurance v. Lavoie · United States v. Orozco-Santillan · Duran v. City of Douglas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[tjhreat-ening, resisting, intimidating or interfering with any forest officer engaged in or on account of the performance of his official duties in the protection, improvement, or administration of the National Forest System.” 13 . Hoff, supra note 9 , 22 F.3d at 223 . 14 . Id. at 224 . 15 . C.L.D., supra note 2, 739 A.2d at 357. 16 . See Hoff, supra note 9 , 22 F.3d at 223 (tied-up dog lacked apparent ability to attack officer). 17 . A modern dictionary definition of”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “); United States v. Orozco-Santillan, 903 F.2d 1262 , 1266 (9th Cir.1990) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.