United States v. Mora’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 409 · 1994
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably United States v. Pratt (2001), United States v. Tropiano (1995)
32 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 851 (§ 411 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on United States v. Kim · United States v. Campbell · United States v. Marquez · United States v. Stephenson · United States v. Eng
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n general, issues of recidivism in sentencing are dealt with through the criminal history categories,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t is difficult to understand why a life term of supervised release is reasonable for a defendant who is no different from any other recidivist,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.