O'Connell v. Hove’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 463 · 1994
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Relationships
Applies 29 U.S.C. § 203 · 29 U.S.C. § 207 · 29 U.S.C. § 213 · 29 U.S.C. § 216 · 5 U.S.C. § 5542 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 7103 · 5 U.S.C. § 7114 · 5 U.S.C. § 7121
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co. · Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug Stores · Bush v. Lucas · Kelly v. Robinson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the CSRA contemplates that unions unwilling to confine FLSA issues to the grievance procedures they negotiate can negotiate to preserve judicial remedies”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[t]he issue in Barrentine was whether a provision in a collective bargaining agreement, requiring the submission of “any controversy” to the negotiated grievance procedures, barred a private FLSA action in district court. The issue in Alexander was whether a private party who had submitted a claim to arbitration pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement could then pursue a trial de novo in federal court under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Neither of those cases involved the CSRA, nor any other comprehensive statute regarding labor-management relations.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“[W]e agree with the Federal Circuit, that [federal employees'] `reliance on [these cases], all dealing with private sector labor disputes, is misplaced.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.