Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.3d 477 - United States v. Clemente

United States v. Clemente’s Empirical Analysis

22 F.3d 477 · 1994

Citation profile

71
cited by 71 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 71 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably United States v. Rigas (2007), United States v. Wong (1994)

36 federal appellate · 1 district ·

360199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1962 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Stirone v. United States · Carolco Television Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co. · Batson v. Kentucky · DiCarlantonio v. United States · GLK, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “modify essential elements of the offense charged to the point that there is a substantial likelihood that the defendant may have been convicted of an offense other than the one charged by the grand jury.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In order to establish a Hobbs Act conspiracy, the government does not have to prove any overt act. . . . The government needs to prove only that an agreement to commit extortion existed, not that extortion was actually committed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “essential element” of the offense has been modified, we have”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.