Blackmon v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 560 · 1994
Citation profile
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Townsend v. Sain · Napue v. People of the State of Illinois
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“even when officers instruct an agent not to ask a defendant questions about his case, if the agent does more than just listen to incriminating remarks, a sixth amendment violation occurs.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The state is not required to furnish a defendant with exculpatory evidence that is fully available to the defendant or that could be obtained through reasonable diligence”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[T]he prosecutor is under no duty to make a complete and detailed accounting to defense counsel of all investigatory work done.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.