United States v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 674 · 1994
Citation profile
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 136 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Ewolski v. City of Brunswick (2002), United States v. Rohrig (1996)
63 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · Boykin v. Alabama · United States v. Leon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 136 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he mere presence of firearms does not create exigent circumstances.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'completely obviate the warrant requirement'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“after freeing sexual assault victim who had been held against her will to secure a warrant before further searching the home in which she had been held). 55 Thus, the potential dangers attendant to a cutting or stabbing call, the fact that plaintiffs' solicited the response they received, the need to safeguard the paramedics and others, including creating a safe environment and figuring out what happened, and the need to act swiftly to tend to Thacker's injury justified the entry in this case. 3 B. Fourth Amendment Unlawful Seizure Claims 56 The Fourth Amendment states in pertinent part that”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.