Milone v. Camp’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 693 · 1994
Citation profile
48 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 101 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably United States v. Hook (1999), Wilson v. Sirmons (2008)
48 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. · In the Matter of Samuel Winship
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 101 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“need not address both Strickland prongs if it is clear that [defendant] cannot satisfy one of them: There is no need to discuss prejudice if counsel's performance was not deficient, and there is no need to evaluate counsel's performance if there was no prejudice resulting from counsel's actions.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Absent a showing that the admission of evidence violated a specific constitutional guarantee, a federal court can issue a writ of habeas corpus on the basis of a state court evidentiary ruling only when the ruling violated the defendant's right to due process . . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“outside the wide range of professionally competent assistance,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.