United States v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis
22 F.3d 783 · 1994
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 2015
10 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1963 (§ 901 of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 3742
Relies on Landreth Timber Co. v. Landreth · Penn v. Parke State Bank · Alexander v. United States · Department of Revenue of Montana v. Ranch · Carballo v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Almost any crime that consists of a pattern of activity over a long period of time would qualify as an offense involving more than minimal planning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“position of trust for purposes of § 3B1.3,” and finding that the three defendants”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.