Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 F.3d 880 - American Casualty Co. v. Baker

American Casualty Co. v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis

22 F.3d 880 · 1994

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
August 2021
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2021 · most notably Crawford v. Lungren (1996), City of Auburn v. United States Government (1998)

15 federal appellate · 4 district · 2 state decisions

2301994200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 12 U.S.C. § 1441A

Relies on Carnegie v. United States · United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. · 2 Cal. 4th 1254 - Bank of the West v. Superior Court · 51 Cal. 3d 807 - AIU Insurance v. Superior Court · Brame v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “present controversy as to which effective relief can be granted”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Marion Franklyn Miller, Jr. v. Robert G. Borg John Dupue Ed Alameda Sgt. O'Brian D. R. Jude Dr. Milliman Giatonde · Dickinson v. Lewis
  2. “—precludes coverage based on mere notice of potential claims. This is confirmed by a careful reading of the unambiguous language in [the Notice of Claims Clause], requiring that notice of potential claims be given”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 682 So. 2d 620 - US Fire Ins. Co. v. Fleekop
  3. “A renewed insurance policy is chronologically new but perpetuates the terms and conditions of the original policy unless the parties provide otherwise.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. New Hampshire Insurance Company, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States of America James Weatherford, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.