¶1 David Lawrence Dixon appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983 (West Supp.2001) com *219 plaint and denying a subsequent motion to vacate under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Dixon v. Painter, No. CA-00-602-5 (S.D. W. Va. Mar. 1, 2001; Sep. 27, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶2 AFFIRMED.