Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 F. App'x 285

United States v. Herbert

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 18, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-12-18

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2004

1 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-12-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1Todd Andrew Herbert seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Herbert, Nos. CR-97-24; CV-00-170 (W.D.Va. May 30, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2DISMISSED.

/22/fappx/285 · .json · Public domain