Lilly v. United States

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2001

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-12-20

Cited by 3 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2004

1 district ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-12-20

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Sara Elizabeth Lilly appeals from the district court’s order granting the United States’ motion to dismiss, under Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), her complaint filed under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b) (West Supp.2001), 28 U.S.C.A. §§ 2671-2680 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the parties’ briefs, the joint appendix, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Ac *294 cordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Lilly v. United States, No. CA-00-1006-2 (S.D.W.Va. May 11, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.