Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 F. App'x 360

Cintron v. Beck

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided January 24, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-01-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636

Decided 2002-01-24

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Charles Carlo Cintron seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). * We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. Cintron v. Beck, No. CA-01-158-1 (M.D.N.C. July 17, 2001). We grant Cin-iron’s motion to waive the requirement to file multiple copies of pleadings in this appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

*

¶3 The parties consented to the magistrate judge’s jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (1994).

/22/fappx/360 · .json · Public domain