Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 F. App'x 76

Austin v. Smith

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2001

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2001-12-04

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2002

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2001-12-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 SUMMARY ORDER

¶2UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

¶3Gwendolyn 0. Austin appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment dismissing her action against Ford Models, Inc. for unlawful termination under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. We affirm for substantially the reasons stated in Magistrate Judge Peck’s Opinion and Order. See Gwendolyn O. Austin v. Ford Models, Inc., 95 Civ. 3731, 2000 WL 1752966 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2000).

/22/fappx/76 · .json · Public domain