22 F. Supp. 2d 1210 - Stein v. Sprint Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 47 U.S.C. § 203 · 47 U.S.C. § 414
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Scheuer v. Rhodes · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · Raines v. Byrd · Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Whether a consumer seeks or is entitled to recover damages or has an adequate remedy at law, a consumer may bring a class action for declaratory judgment, an injunction and appropriate ancillary relief, except damages, against an act or practice that violates this act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“Regardless of the carrier's motive whether it seeks to benefit or harm a particular customer the policy of nondiscriminatory rates is violated when similarly situated customers pay different rates for the same services.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.