Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

22 Ga. App. 239

Poulos v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 12, 1918

Court of Appeals of Georgia · decided 1918-04-12

<p>Accusation, of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Rourke. February 2, 1918.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1941

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1918-04-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Broyles, P. J.

¶11. There is no merit in that ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that “the venue was not proved or the offense shown to have been committed within the statute of limitations.”

¶22. The verdict was amply supported by the evidence, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

Bloodworth and Harwell, JJ., concur.Accusation, of misdemeanor; from city court of Savannah— Judge Rourke. February 2, 1918.Shelby Myriclc, for plaintiff in error.Walter 0. Ilartridge, solicitor-general, contra.
/22/gaapp/239 · .json · Public domain