Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 HAW 129 - Harrison v. McCandless

Harrison v. McCandless’s Empirical Analysis

1914

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
November 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently November 2011

10 state decisions

4019141920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Houston v. Farris · Coney v. Manele · Ward v. Kamanaoulu · Kaaihue v. Crabbe · Brown v. Koloa Sugar Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any instrument which is evidence of the exclusive right of possession of land in a party, is title; and the assertion of such raises a question of title within the meaning of the proviso to section 1662 Revised Laws denying to district courts jurisdiction in cases where ‘the title to real estate shall come in question.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.