People v. Curtis’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1975
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 57 Ill. 2d 279 - People v. Mahle · 132 Ill. App. 2d 786 - People v. Tenen · 18 Ill. App. 3d 617 - People v. Greer · People v. Brakebill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A person commits a deceptive practice when, with the intent to defraud: # # # (d) With the intent to obtain control over property or to pay for property, labor or services of another he issues or delivers a check or other order upon a real or fictitious depository for the payment of money, knowing that it will not be paid by the depository. # * *” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Norris““The essential elements of the offense of deceptive practice are the intent to defraud and the intent to obtain control-over property of another. [Citation.]””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Norris
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.