22 Ill. App. 3d 66 - People v. King’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Harris v. New York · 38 Ill. 2d 216 - The People v. Lefler · 120 Ill. App. 2d 313 - People v. Richards · 16 Ill. 2d 459 - The People v. Stanton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold likewise that when the voluntary nature of an out-of-court statement is put into question, no distinction should be drawn between inculpatory and exculpatory statements. The court must, out of the presence of the jury, make a finding on this matter.” King, 22 Ill. App. 3d 66, 71 , 316 N.E.2d 642, 646 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.