J-P’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252B (§ 242b of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Lindh v. Murphy · Ungar v. Sarafite · Mathews v. Diaz · Mart Corporation v. Cartier Inc 47th Street Photo Inc · Harisiades v. Shaughnessy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“no detail regarding the cause, severity, or treatment of the alleged illness”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Alrefae v. Chertoff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.