22 I. & N. Dec. 434 - PALACIOS’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 1952 · 18 U.S.C. § 3607 · 18 U.S.C. § 81 · 18 U.S.C. § 844 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 994 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Taylor v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Mathews v. Diaz · Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath · Bridges v. Wixon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the intentional starting of a fire or causing an explosion ordinarily would lead to the substantial risk of damaging property of another. Not only is there a risk to items belonging to others that are on or in the property, i.e., such as items left in a store, there always exists the risk that the fire will spread beyond the original intended property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Tran v. Gonzales“arson in the first degree, by its very nature, requires a substantial risk of physical force against another person or property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Tran v. Gonzales
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.