CERVANTES’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (Identity Theft and Assumption Deterrence Act of 1998) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1185 (§ 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1254 (§ 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1324C (§ 274c of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Lindh v. Murphy · Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit · Bowen v. Georgetown University Hospital
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.