L-V-C’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1001 (Comprehensive Thrift and Bank Fraud Prosecution and Taxpayer Recovery Act of 1990) · 18 U.S.C. § 1426 · 18 U.S.C. § 982 (§ 1366 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 31 U.S.C. § 5313 · 31 U.S.C. § 5316 · 31 U.S.C. § 5322 · 31 U.S.C. § 5324 (§ 1354 of the Money Laundering Control Act of 1986) · 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Ratzlaf et Ux United States · United States v. Bajakajian · Cummings v. United States · Hamdan v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Goldeshtein v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.