LUIS’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1831 · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 371 · 18 U.S.C. § 793 · 18 U.S.C. § 794 · 18 U.S.C. § 951 · 18 U.S.C. § 957 · 21 U.S.C. § 802 (§ 102 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Elias-Zacarias · Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-Fonseca · Colorado v. Connelly · Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Departure from the United States of a person who is the subject of deportation or removal proceedings ... subsequent to the taking of an appeal, but prior to a decision thereon, shall constitute a withdrawal of the appeal, and the initial decision in the case shall be final to the same extent as though no appeal had been taken.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.