JOSEPH’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 35 later decisions (3 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2021 · most notably Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim (2003), Jennings v. Rodriguez (2018)
13 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on United States v. Aguilar · Cover v. State · United States v. John
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a lawful permanent resident will not be considered `properly included' in a mandatory detention category when an Immigration Judge or the Board is convinced that the [government] is substantially unlikely to establish at the merits hearing, or on appeal, the charge or charges that would otherwise subject the alien to mandatory detention.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Tijani v. Willis“the opportunity to offer evidence and legal authority on the question whether the Service has properly included him within a category that is subject to mandatory detention”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“bond ruling as to whether the alien is properly included in a mandatory detention category”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Diaz v. Hott
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.