¶1‘‘ The motion was made before answer served. The learned judge was right in denying the motion. It did not appear that an additional bill of particulars was necessary to defendant, to enable him to answer the complaint. Order affirmed, with $10 costs.”
22 Jones & S. 558
Leavitt v. Chase
The Superior Court of New York City
Decided March 14, 1887
The Superior Court of New York City · decided 1887-03-14
Appeal by defendant from order denying defendant’s motion for a further bill of particulars. Edwin R. Leavitt, for appellant. Austin G. Fox, for respondent.
Decided 1887-03-14