22 Kan. App. 2d 340 - State v. Murray’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In re Sturm · 20 Kan. App. 2d 277 - Foulk v. Colonial Terrace · Micheaux v. Amalgamated Meatcutters & Butcher Workmen of North America, Local P-94 · State v. MacKey · State v. Luginbill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Where a court has wide discretion in sentencing, both die prosecution and defendant submit to tiiat discretion when entering a plea agreement. In such circumstances, a guilty plea is not involuntaiy if the defendant is told of the range of the court’s discretion before entering the plea. See, e.g., [State v.] Solomon, 257 Kan. [212, 217, 891 P.2d 407 (1995)]. Where the law and die facts specifically dictate or allow a sentencing enhancement, however, the prosecution and the court must share knowledge of such a situation with the defendant in order for the guilty plea to be voluntaiy. [Citations omitted.] In order to allow a criminal defense attorney to fulfill his or her obligations to a defendant concerning die consequences of pleading guilty, the defense attorney must have, and thus the prosecutor must share with the defense attorney, knowledge of any expunged juvenile adjudications that will be used in the defendant’s criminal histoiy.” Murray, 22 Kan. App. 2d at 348 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““(a) Before or during trial a plea of guilty or nolo contendere may be accepted when: (3) in felony cases the court has addressed the defendant personally and determined that the plea is made voluntarily with understanding of the nature of the charge and the consequences of the plea.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[b]ecause the trial court addressed the latter more specific issue concerning expunged juvenile adjudications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Thomas
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.