22 Kan. App. 2d 359 - State v. Dighera’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
May 2006
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch · In re Sturm · State v. Donlay · 20 Kan. App. 2d 277 - Foulk v. Colonial Terrace · Martindale v. Tenny
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““[W]e believe there are sound policy reasons for not requiring the trial court, when receiving a defendant’s plea, to advise the defendant of the presumption of probation or incarceration. At arraignment, or any other stage of the proceeding when a plea may be offered, the court will have little information concerning the case other than the crimes charged and their severity level. The court will, in all likelihood, not know the defendant’s criminal history.” 22 Kan. App. 2d at 364.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.