Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Kan. App. 2d 721 - State v. Torrance

22 Kan. App. 2d 721 - State v. Torrance’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schiro v. Clark · In re Sturm · 20 Kan. App. 2d 277 - Foulk v. Colonial Terrace · Wright v. Kansas Water Office · State v. Deavers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““K.S.A. 22-3501 requires a motion for a new trial be filed within 10 days of a Verdict or finding of guilty.’ It is discretionaiy for the trial court to grant an extension of time for this filing if such application for an extension was made within the 10-day statutory period.” State v. Torrance, 22 Kan. App. 2d 721, 729 , 922 P.2d 1109 (1996).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “consideration; that is, whether the trial court has abused its discretion by imposing a sentence that is obviously unfair and shocks the conscience of the court. [Citation omitted.]'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “'whether a sentence has resulted in 15 manifest injustice must be made on a case-by-case basis under a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.