22 Kan. App. 2d 922 - Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently December 2022
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on United States v. Bilzerian · Williams v. Ezell · Potts v. Zant · Taylor v. State · Estep v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a party may only dismiss the action by filing a motion to dismiss and seeking an order of the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kleypas v. State“before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kleypas v. State“may be voluntarily dismissed under K.S.A. 60-241(a)(1).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kleypas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.