Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 McCanless 665 - Milliken v. Smith

Milliken v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
4
states following
October 2007
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently October 2007 · most notably Concrete Spaces, Inc. v. Sender (1999), Transports, Inc. v. Perry (1967)

27 state decisions

8019661970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 5 Smith & H. 407 - Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. White · 51 Tenn. App. 691 - Alabama Highway Express, Inc. v. Luster · 30 Tenn. App. 289 - Penley v. Glover

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The obligation of every jury is summarized in the oath taken by its members to render a true verdict according to the law and the evidence. This applies whether the jury is trying one or more cases. And where it plainly appears from the verdicts returned by a jury that it has not fulfilled this obligation, but acting upon considerations other than those presented in the law and the evidence has returned irreconcilably conflicting verdicts, it is the duty of the trial court to order the jury to consider further with respect to these verdicts, and if it refuses (which we doubt will ever be the case), to order a mistrial, otherwise this Court must reverse.” 405 S.W.2d at 477 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.