Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 Md. App. 475 - Ches v. Ches

22 Md. App. 475 - Ches v. Ches’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 1998
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 1998

8 state decisions

40197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ballan v. Ballan · Kruse v. Kruse · Scheinin v. Scheinin · Matysek v. Matysek · Eberwein v. Eberwein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is also settled that the conduct of one spouse which causes the other to leave the marital abode may justify a divorce on the ground of constructive desertion, even though the offensive conduct might not justify a divorce on the ground of cruelty. To justify the departure by the offended spouse, however, the conduct must be such as to render impossible a continuation of marital cohabitation with safety, health and self-respect. Murphy v. Murphy, supra; Schwartzman v. Schwartzman, 204 Md. 125 , 102 A. 2d 810 (1954); Eberwein v. Eberwein, 193 Md. 95 , 65 A. 2d 792 (1949); Kruse v. Kruse, 179 Md. 657 , 22 A. 2d 475 (1941). As Chief Judge Murphy stated for this Court in Neff v. Neff, supra; ‘For such a situation to exist, there must be a pattern of personal conduct which is detrimental to the safety or health of the complaining spouse, or so demeaning to his or her self-respect as to be intolerable.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.