Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 MINN 185 - Griffiths v. Wolfram

Griffiths v. Wolfram’s Empirical Analysis

1875

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
5
states following
May 1961
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently May 1961

1 district · 12 state decisions

401875188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whether a negligent servant is liable in an action for damages by another servant in the employ of the same master depends upon the common-law obligation to so conduct himself as not to cause injury to another, and does not rest upon any duty imposed by privity of contract.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.