Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 22 MO 405 - Rollins v. Claybrook

Rollins v. Claybrook’s Empirical Analysis

1856

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
July 1992
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently July 1992 · most notably Jake C. Byers, Inc. v. J.B.C. Investments (1992), Tracy v. Union Iron Works Co. (1891)

1 federal appellate · 26 state decisions

90185618601870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Stackpole v. Arnold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Undoubtedly tbe existence of a separate oral agreement as to any matter-on wbicb a- written contract is silent, and which is not inconsistent with its-terms, may be proven by parol, if under the circumstances of the particular case it may> properly be inferred that the parties did not intend the written-paper to be a complete and final statement of the whole transaction between them. * * * And when the writing itself upon its face is couched in such terms as import a complete legal obligation, without any uncertainty as to the object or 'extent of the engagement, it is conclusively presumed that the whole-engagement of the parties, and the extent and manner of their undertaking, were reduced to-writing.” «”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.